Details
This study asks a number of important questions. How did the plaintiffs and defendants choose their witnesses? What motives and constraints shaped their choices? How did they gain access to the various gentrynetworks that spoke in their defence? To what extent did lordly influence impact upon the composition of each witness list? How well did the witnesses themselves know each other? What role did bonds of regional solidarity play before the Court? Perhaps most significantly, what does the testimony itself reveal about the chivalric culture of the age? These questions enable the historian to probe in considerable depth the character of gentry military society, and its chivalric ethos, at a time when the victories of Edward III (1327-1377) were receding ever deeper into popular memory and the triumphs of Henry V (1413-1422) still lay in the future.
PHILIP CAUDREY is an Honorary Research Associate at the University of Tasmania, Australia.
Table of Contents
Military Service
Lordship
Region, Locality and Community
Soldiers, Civilians and Chivalric Memory
Conclusion
Appendix 1: Deponents' Collective Military Records According to their Own Testimony
Appendix 2: Lancastrian Retainers: Scrope and Hastings Defendants
Appendix 3 Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Biographies
Bibliography
Index
Reviews & Quotes
"An excellent book...a carefully assembled study, full of varied interest. It deserves aplace as a significant contribution to the history, mainly the military and social sort, of late medievalEngland."
REVIEWS IN HISTORY ()
"Insightful . . . opens up areas for additional research, notably assessment of comparable courts and cases."
JOURNAL OF BRITISH STUDIES
()
"A valuable contribution to the subject."
COAT OF ARMS
()
"This is a valuable study for those interested in understanding late medieval military society in England."
CHOICE
()
Additional Information
AmazonLink | N/A |
---|---|
AppleLink | N/A |
BNLink | N/A |
GoogleLink | N/A |
KoboLink | N/A |